
Working Capital vs. Equipment Financing





Straight answers before you send the equipment file.
You can, and we've seen operators do it. But you'll carry the higher-rate working capital cost until the refi closes, and some lenders won't refinance a unit that was purchased with unsecured working capital funds. The cleaner move is to start with equipment financing on the front end.
Because drawing $90,000 off a revolving line ties up capacity you may need for payroll, fuel, or a supplier deposit. Equipment financing is a separate facility secured by the lift, so the line stays available. You also get a fixed monthly payment rather than a revolving balance with a variable rate.
Equipment loans typically show up on the balance sheet as a separate long-term liability, not as a draw against a revolving line. This usually has a smaller impact on your borrowing capacity than most operators expect. Many banks view properly structured equipment debt as neutral to positive because it's secured by a depreciating hard asset.
No. Equipment financing underwriting looks primarily at the business's cash flow (three months of bank statements) and the value of the collateral. An existing working capital balance doesn't disqualify you; it's one factor among several, not a gating requirement.
Yes. Seasonal payment structures are available, including step-up payments tied to your busy season and deferred starts if you need time before the unit generates revenue. That flexibility is one of the reasons equipment financing often fits a yard's cash flow better than a rigid working capital draw.
Tell us what you are buying, who is selling it, and when you need it earning. We will review the file and point you to the next step.